Pages

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Gaming as a New Paradigm


Gaming is most definitely the new paradigm in education. This has become obvious at the college level, where institutions are implementing simulation gaming for courses like chemistry and anatomy. They are even using it to training doctors. This is not a recent occurance, NYU (New York University) has been using sim/virtual game technology for a while now.  They call it interactive virtual 3D; essentially it is a game. The first thing we think is “wow, that’s really cool!”
As educators, we are ready for the change. We may be overdue in fact. Students are bored with textbooks and direct instruction. They want more and are able to absorb a lot of information if it is presented in a digital and interactive format. I like the connections that Clark Aldrich makes in his blog. He states that, “the ease with which players in a new virtual environment move from exploratory behaviors to more structured simulation structures also illustrates the connection among virtual worlds, simulations, and games.” I think there is potential for real growth in educational gaming in this respect. I can see the dynamics of Aldrich’s HIVE theory in action when my son plays Minecraft. He started out small in exploratory behaviors like setting up sheep pens, and moved into more structured simulation now and is out to conquering the (virtual) world.  I also believe it has to be constrained. Kids do need a pop-up on their computer screen that tells them “hands off, shut me off and go outside and play” (Ginsberg, NYTS video, 2012).

In the video from the New York Times Schools for Tomorrow conference, Dr. Wadhwa was talking about the expense of education. I was surprised by the Neuro-sky Mindwave Headset he talked about that would be used to gauge emotion which equates to learning. Schools are looking for ways to reduce costs and it seems as though one way to offset costs is to develop course once and repeat often. In order for this approach to be cost-effective, it would have to be repeated very often. It occurs to me that we would be Instructional Designers and not teachers in the classic sense anymore. Would teachers be needed? Or would teaching be delivered via sims with bubble test modules that a school system can purchase?
I noticed that Dr. Wadhwa is using an ipad for the discussion. Mobile technology is already taking over computer information delivery. He mentioned that in India, people can buy a thirty-five dollar tablet! Why do we pay so much in the US? The US the cell companies own the lines, which forces us to pay far more than the rest of the world for cell and data usage. And let’s not talk about the contracts!
I think the video points out many, many good points about technology. I wonder how the ideas they talked about will be implemented if people can’t work together now. Also, if debating promotes learning, as mentioned in the video, shouldn’t we learn to talk to each other face to face (a problem young people have that was also mentioned in the video)? I am concerned that younger students are going to become withdrawn and antisocial. The younger we place students in computer-based instruction, the sooner we will lose them as great debators and speakers. How will we deliver a sermon or inaugural speech in the future, by tweeting or virtual 3D?
I still think that we need more research on kids to find out exactly how the brain is stimulated by ongoing video gaming. I say this because it seems that boys are more absorbed in gaming than girls, and it can be addicting for them. Also, one of the people participating in the panel discussion is from Google… a corporation that has a great interest in marketing their technology to everyone. I just wonder where the good ends and the disruptive (or worse) begins.

Resources
Livestream.com. August, 2012. New York Times Schools For Tomorrow Conference. Retrieved from http://www.livestream.com/nytschoolsfortomorrow/video?clipId=pla_f5879bc8-7e85-435c-be01-17737bd28c6b
NYU School Of Medicine website. Jan 18, 2013. Retrieved from http://school.med.nyu.edu/

 

 


 

 

No comments: